Author: blogs2025

  • Dawn Richard Denies Drugging Day26’s Que At Diddy’s Request

    Dawn Richard Denies Drugging Day26’s Que At Diddy’s Request


    Dawn Richard

    “I want to be unequivocally clear: I have never drugged anyone, nor have I ever given anyone pills to take,” she wrote in a post captured by Onsite.


    Dawn Richard is responding to ex-boyfriend Que’s shocking claims of her drugging him at the request of their Bad Boy boss Sean “Diddy” Combs.

    The Danity Kane singer shared a since-deleted statement on X denying the Day26 singer’s claims, which he revealed on Aubrey O’Day’s Do You Believe Me Now? podcast.

    “I want to be unequivocally clear: I have never drugged anyone, nor have I ever given anyone pills to take,” she wrote in the post captured by Onsite.

    Richard said Que’s claims are “categorically false” and don’t coincide with their continued relationship after the alleged drugging took place.

    “If such a belief were genuine,” she wrote, “it would be inconsistent with the actions that followed—like inviting me into your home, introducing me to your family, and continuing a relationship.”

    Her statement has faced backlash online, with many siding with Que and pointing to her recent court testimony against Diddy as a reason to question her denial.

    “Her response makes no sense,” one critic wrote. “She said she didn’t drug him, and if she did, then why would he continue the relationship, but she didn’t she just testify how she watched Diddy abuse Cassie multiple times and she continued working with him?”

    As details of the horrors surrounding Diddy’s behavior continue to emerge in his trial for federal sex trafficking and RICO charges, many of his artists and affiliates are receiving added attention on what they might say or reveal about the disgraced music mogul.

    Que claims Richard gave him what he believes was a horse tranquilizer, which triggered a psychotic episode that took time to recover from.

    “Whatever ritual, spell, or manipulation that pill carried, it hijacked my autonomy,” Que shared in a lengthy Instagram caption. “I began isolating myself. Sleep became my only escape from the pressure in my skull. I truly believed it was orchestrated by her boss—a display of power meant to destabilize a ‘weak’ mind and instill fear.”

    Richard said she remained silent about their breakup out of respect and is now calling for compassion toward everyone affected by Diddy’s alleged abuse. “This isn’t about one person,” she wrote. “My intention has always been to move forward with integrity.”

    RELATED CONTENT: Former Danity Kane Member Dawn Richard Sues Diddy For Sexual Assault



  • Plant-Based Milks Don't Meet Toddlers' Nutrient Needs

    Plant-Based Milks Don't Meet Toddlers' Nutrient Needs


    More and more parents are choosing plant-based drinks for their toddlers, often because they think they’re making a healthier or more sustainable choice. Whether it’s almond, oat or soy, these alternatives are showing up in sippy cups across the U.S. — and often replacing cow’s milk entirely. But just because something is labeled “plant-based” or “dairy-free” doesn’t mean it’s nutritionally complete, healthy or developmentally appropriate for young children.

    This is especially important during the vulnerable window between 12 and 24 months, when a child’s brain, bones and body are growing at a rapid pace. Every bite and sip matters. And when key nutrients are missing, it quietly undermines that growth in ways most parents don’t see coming.

    If you’ve ever questioned whether a plant-based drink is a safe swap for milk — or if you’re already relying on one without knowing the full impact — you’re not alone. That’s exactly what researchers have started to investigate, and the findings are eye-opening. Let’s take a closer look at what happens when plant-based drinks replace cow’s milk in toddlers’ diets.

    Most Plant-Based Drinks Fail to Meet Toddlers’ Nutritional Needs

    A German study published in the Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition set out to understand what happens when you swap cow’s milk for plant-based alternatives in children’s diets.1 Researchers substituted only the daily serving of cow’s milk with common plant-based options like soy, oat and almond drinks, while keeping the rest of the diet unchanged. Their goal was to measure the nutritional fallout from this single swap.

    The study included common store-bought drinks and child-specific formulas — Six drinks were analyzed: basic soy, oat and almond drinks; fortified versions of soy and almond drinks; and two products marketed specifically for toddlers.

    This included a soy-based “growing-up” drink and a dietetic soy formula for infants with milk intolerance. These represented typical items found in German markets and closely mirrored what parents actually purchase for young children.

    Most plant-based drinks caused a sharp drop in important nutrients — Daily intake of calcium, vitamin B2 (riboflavin), vitamin B12 and iodine fell by around 50% when non-fortified plant-based drinks were used.2 That means swapping out cow’s milk cut these important nutrients in half, even in an otherwise well-balanced meal plan.

    Nutrient bioavailability is a problem in many plant-based drinks — Even when drinks are fortified, the minerals and vitamins added are often less bioavailable than those found naturally in milk. That means your body absorbs less of what’s listed on the label. So, even if numbers on the label seem high, the actual amount your child’s body uses is often far lower.

    Parents need better tools to assess these swaps — Researchers warned that parents can’t accurately assess the impact of swapping cow’s milk for plant-based alternatives.

    Most drinks look healthy on the surface and include marketing claims like “dairy-free” or “source of calcium,” but few truly match milk’s nutritional profile. Even a small change in a toddler’s daily diet has ripple effects on their long-term growth, bone health, immune function and brain development.

    For clarity, this study didn’t involve physically swapping milk for plant-based drinks and then checking nutrient levels in children. Instead, it used a theoretical model based on the Optimized Mixed Diet (OMD), which is a guideline diet for children in Germany.

    The researchers created scenarios where they replaced all fluid cow’s milk (219 g/day) in the OMD’s 7-day menu with different plant-based drinks (soy, oat, almond, fortified or non-fortified). They then calculated the nutrient intake for that 7-day menu to see the immediate effect of the swap.

    In other words, this wasn’t a real-world experiment measuring levels in children over time — it was a nutritional analysis of what would happen to nutrient intake if milk was fully replaced in the diet, based on the nutrient content of the drinks.

    Doctors Urge Parents to Rethink Plant-Based Drinks for Toddlers

    A 2021 commentary published in JAMA Pediatrics reviewed recommendations on plant-based beverage intake for infants and young children and found widespread agreement among health authorities: most plant-based drinks are not suitable substitutes for cow’s milk in children younger than 2.3

    Most pediatric guidelines advise against plant drinks for toddlers — Across high-income countries, including the U.S., Canada and Australia, official dietary guidance strongly advises parents not to use plant-based beverages as replacements for milk in kids under 2.

    Frequent or total replacement of milk with plant-based drinks is a red flag for nutrient deficiencies — Doctors were urged to ask parents directly how often plant-based drinks are used and whether they fully replace cow’s milk. This is because frequent substitution raises the risk of serious nutritional gaps.

    Dozens of real-world cases showed serious consequences from plant-based diets in infants — A report cited in the commentary examined 30 case studies of infants and toddlers, ranging from 4 to 22 months old, who were fed plant-based drinks, either by themselves or along with foods like fruits and vegetables.

    All of the children developed serious nutrition-related illnesses, including rickets (caused by soft, weakened bones), scurvy (a result of vitamin C deficiency), protein deficiency or metabolic alkalosis, a dangerous condition that disrupts the body’s acid-base balance and impairs breathing and organ function.

    Soy contains antinutrients — Although soy drinks have the highest protein content among plant-based options, soy’s bioavailability — or how much protein the body actually uses — is reduced by plant-based antinutrients.

    Why Soy Formula Is One of the Worst Choices for Your Baby

    If you’re relying on soy infant formula as a dairy-free alternative, you need to know what that decision means for your baby’s long-term health. Soy infant formula is often promoted as a safe option for lactose-intolerant individuals or vegan households, but research says otherwise.

    Soy formula changes the way DNA works in babies — A study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives looked at girls who were fed soy formula.4 Researchers found differences in DNA tags, specifically in vaginal cells, compared to girls who were fed cow’s milk formula.

    These DNA tags are like tiny switches that tell genes whether to be active or inactive. In this study, the tag affected a gene that responds to the hormone estrogen. This is a significant concern because hormones like estrogen are important for how girls’ bodies develop, especially their reproductive systems.

    So, why is soy such a problem? Soy milk and soy formula contain significantly more phytoestrogens — plant compounds that mimic estrogen in the body — than cow’s milk or breast milk. No developing child should be exposed to that level of hormonal disruption.

    Plant-Based Milk Is Just Another Ultraprocessed Food

    It’s also important to realize that plant-based drinks are ultraprocessed foods, meaning they’ve been heavily modified from their original form and typically contain additives like gums, emulsifiers, synthetic vitamins and artificial flavorings. While many people switch to plant-based drinks thinking they’re more natural, the processing involved strips away beneficial compounds and introduces additives your child doesn’t need.

    Eating ultraprocessed plant foods increases your disease risk — A study published in The Lancet Regional Health Europe followed 126,842 people and examined the health impact of different types of plant-based foods.

    While every 10% increase in whole, unprocessed plant foods, like fruits and vegetables, lowered cardiovascular disease risk by 7% and heart disease-related death by 13%, plant-based ultraprocessed foods had the opposite effect. Each 10% increase in these foods was linked to a 5% higher risk of heart disease and a 12% increase in the risk of dying from it.5

    Cow’s milk is a minimally processed whole food with real health benefits — Unlike ultraprocessed plant drinks, milk from grass fed cows is naturally rich in essential nutrients and requires minimal processing — especially when it’s raw.

    Whole milk contains healthy fats, protein, calcium and fat-soluble vitamins in a form your child’s body can actually use. It’s a complete food, not a lab-engineered imitation. When you compare ingredient labels, it becomes obvious which product is closer to what nature intended.

    Whole-Fat Dairy Delivers Rare Nutrients That Support Total-Body Health

    Whole dairy products from grass fed cows are a primary source of odd-chain saturated fatty acids (OCFAs). These unique fats are not produced by your body and must be obtained through food.

    Unique dairy fats are linked to lower risks of chronic diseases — Higher blood levels of OCFAs have been associated with reduced risks of Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, fatty liver, inflammation and even overall mortality.6 You don’t get these benefits from almond, soy or oat drinks.

    Raw, grass fed milk boosts gut and immune health naturally — When sourced from organic, pasture-raised cows, raw milk also offers living enzymes, beneficial bacteria and immune-supporting compounds that support digestion and help protect against illness. That’s something no ultraprocessed product delivers. Just be sure to choose milk from farmers who don’t use iodine-based disinfectants to avoid excess iodine in your child’s diet.

    What to Do if Your Toddler Is Drinking Plant-Based Milk

    If you’ve been giving your toddler plant-based drinks thinking they’re just as good as — or better than — cow’s milk, you’re not alone. It’s a common choice, especially if you’re avoiding dairy yourself or assuming organic almond or oat milk is safer. But as you’ve seen in the research, most of these drinks don’t supply the nutrients your child needs to grow strong and stay healthy. The good news? It’s easy to fix this starting today by making a few changes.

    1. Stop using plant-based drinks as milk replacements — Avoid using plant-based drinks in place of real milk. This is especially important during the growth window between 12 and 24 months. Most of these drinks lack the calcium, B12 and B2 toddlers need — and they don’t absorb nutrients from plants as easily as from milk. Plus, soy milk adds another layer of risk due to exposure to estrogenic compounds that affect reproductive development.

    2. Avoid using soy, oat, almond or other plant-based drinks as a base for infant formula — If you’re formula-feeding or supplementing, I do not recommend using commercial infant formula — especially not soy-based. Absolutely nothing compares to breast milk in terms of nutrition, so if you are a new mother and still lactating, breastfeeding is the best choice for both you and your child. However, I understand that not all moms can breastfeed.

    In this case, I recommend making your own infant formula using this recipe based on nutrient-rich animal foods like raw grass fed cow’s milk, organic raw cream and grass fed beef gelatin. For children who are unable to tolerate milk proteins, I recommend trying this hypoallergenic meat-based formula instead.

    If you’ve already been giving plant-based drinks daily, don’t panic. The body responds quickly to good nutrition. The sooner you make the switch, the more support you give your child’s bones, brain and immune system during the years they need it most.

    FAQs About Plant-Based Milk for Toddlers

    Q: Are plant-based milks safe for toddlers as a replacement for cow’s milk?

    A: No. Most plant-based drinks fail to provide the essential nutrients found in cow’s milk. These include calcium, vitamin B12 and vitamin B2, and iodine, all of which are needed for proper growth, brain development, and immune function during early childhood.

    Q: What makes soy infant formula risky?

    A: Soy formula exposes infants to high levels of phytoestrogens, which are plant compounds that mimic estrogen. Research has shown that girls fed soy formula have altered DNA tags in estrogen-sensitive genes, which could interfere with reproductive development. Soy also contains antinutrients that reduce the body’s ability to absorb protein and minerals.

    Q: What’s the problem with plant-based milks being ultraprocessed?

    A: Ultraprocessed foods are heavily altered and often loaded with gums, emulsifiers and synthetic nutrients. A study found that plant-based ultraprocessed foods were linked to a 5% higher risk of cardiovascular disease and a 12% increase in death from heart disease. In contrast, unprocessed whole foods, like raw, full-fat milk, lower disease risk and support total-body health.

    Q: How does raw, grass fed milk support gut and immune health in toddlers?

    A: Raw milk from grass fed cows contains natural enzymes, beneficial bacteria and immune-boosting compounds that are destroyed during pasteurization. These elements support healthy digestion, nutrient absorption and immune function. It’s a living food, unlike plant-based drinks that rely on synthetic additives to mimic nutrition. Choosing raw milk from farms that avoid iodine-based disinfectants also prevents unnecessary iodine overload in your child’s diet.

    Q: What’s a better alternative for my toddler?

    A: If breastfeeding is not an option, homemade infant formula made from raw grass fed milk, raw cream, beef gelatin and other whole ingredients is a far better choice than any store-bought soy or plant-based formula. If your toddler cannot tolerate cow’s milk, a meat-based hypoallergenic formula is a safer and more nutrient-dense option.

    Test Your Knowledge with Today’s Quiz!

    Take today’s quiz to see how much you’ve learned from yesterday’s Mercola.com article.

    What happens to your platelets when you eat high-fat foods?

    • They become less active, contributing to cancer cell growth
    • They shrink, making it harder for cancer cells to spread
    • They become overly sticky, helping cancer cells attach to organs

      High-fat foods activate your platelets, making them overly sticky. This stickiness helps cancer cells attach and grow rapidly in vital organs like your lungs, promoting cancer spread. Learn more.

    • They multiply, boosting your immune system against cancer
  • Triple-I Blog | Significant Tort Reform Advances in Louisiana

    Triple-I Blog | Significant Tort Reform Advances in Louisiana


    Triple-I Blog | Significant Tort Reform Advances in Louisiana

    Louisiana’s Senate passed five tort reform bills last week to curb legal system abuse driven by billboard attorneys in the Pelican State. The legislative success represents the culmination of sustained advocacy efforts – including a Triple-I-backed awareness campaign, StopLegalSystemAbuse.org – to build public support.

    The new legislation addresses Louisiana’s longstanding challenges with high insurance premiums and the state’s reputation for being plaintiff-friendly in civil litigation. The reforms include stricter limits on damages, clearer standards for expert testimony, and other procedural changes designed to restore balance to the courts while reducing financial burdens on Louisiana families and businesses.

    However, an additional measure intended to change state regulations for approving rate filings for auto and home insurance overshadowed the positive actions taken by lawmakers, the Times-Picayune reported.

    House Bill 431, which would prevent drivers who are at least 51 percent at fault in an accident from receiving any compensation for their own injuries, requires final House approval due to Senate amendments. So do Senate Bill 231, which would allow insurers’ lawyers to present jurors with the actual amount paid for medical bills, rather than the total billed, and House Bill 436, which would ban undocumented immigrants injured in car accidents from receiving general (non-economic) damages.

    House Bill 434, which would increase the threshold from $15,000 to $100,000 for uninsured drivers to collect medical expenses for bodily injuries in accidents, and House Bill 450, which would require plaintiffs in car accident lawsuits to prove their injuries were actually caused by the accident, are awaiting Gov. Jeff Landry’s signature.

    Learn More:

    Triple-I “Trends and Insights” Issues Brief: Louisiana Insurance Market (Members only)

    Louisiana Senator Seeks Resumption of Resilience Investment Program

    Louisiana Reforms: Progress, But More Is Needed to Stem Legal System Abuse

    Louisiana Is Least Affordable State for Personal Auto Coverage Across the South and U.S.

    Who’s Financing Legal System Abuse? Louisianans Need to Know

  • Financial Peace University vs. True Financial Freedom vs. Crown Financial MoneyLife

    Financial Peace University vs. True Financial Freedom vs. Crown Financial MoneyLife


    I recently completed three of the top Christian financial education programs for churches: SeedTime’s True Financial Freedom, Dave Ramsey’s Financial Peace University, and Crown Financial’s MoneyLife.

    These popular programs all claim to help you get control of your finances from a biblical perspective. However, they go about it in different ways with varying teaching styles and philosophies.

    In this post, I’ll provide an in-depth look at each program – breaking down the unique features, strengths, weaknesses, and what’s actually included when you buy in. 

    My goal is to give you the real deal on these courses so you can determine which one (if any) is the best fit for transforming your financial life in a way that aligns with your faith. Whether you’re deep in debt, building wealth, or simply trying to honor God with your money, this comparison will help guide your journey.

    Let’s dive into the nitty-gritty details of each program:

    Pricing

    When it comes to pricing, Financial Peace University from Dave Ramsey sits in the middle. For an individual membership, it’s $69.99. They also offer bulk pricing for churches starting at around $800 for 10 memberships.

    On the higher end, Seedtime’s True Financial Freedom charges $149 for an individual/couple license with regular deals making it available as low as $74. But they have some solid deals for Churches – you can get a bulk student license for as low as $48 per person if you buy multiple licenses. Or there’s an annual church subscription starting as low as $750 per year based on average attendance.

    The most affordable option is Crown Financial’s MoneyLife course at just $29.95 for an individual purchase. I couldn’t find any publicly listed bulk pricing for churches, but being a non-profit, I’d expect them to be the cheapest route for congregations.

    But as you’ll see, there are plenty more differences beyond just the price tags when comparing what’s actually included in each program.

    True Financial Freedom (SeedTime)

    True Financial Freedom, created by Bob Lotich and his wife Linda from SeedTime, is a financial literacy video course designed for churches that strikes a beautiful balance between biblical wisdom and practical money management strategies. The program’s goal is to equip Christians with the tools and mindset they need to experience true financial freedom while making an eternal impact for God’s Kingdom.

    screenshot of Seedtime homepage for True Financial Freedom

    One of the standout features of True Financial Freedom is the engaging and relatable teaching style of Bob and Linda. They share their own financial struggles and triumphs with humor, transparency, and grace, making participants feel like they’re learning from wise, caring friends rather than aloof experts. This approach creates a safe, non-judgmental environment where participants can openly discuss their financial challenges and celebrate their progress.

    The program offers several unique benefits, such as the “Never 100” rule (their ‘done-is-better-than-perfect’ approach to adjust spending) and the “Straight A” strategy for automating finances. These concepts are not only memorable but also highly actionable in helping participants take control of their money and build lasting wealth.

    Another strength of True Financial Freedom is its emphasis on creating a personalized financial strategy. Through interactive workshops, participants are guided in developing a custom blueprint that fits their unique situation, goals, and values. This approach recognizes that there’s no one-size-fits-all solution to personal finance and empowers participants to take ownership of their financial journey.

    True Financial Freedom is perfect for Christians who want to learn how to thrive financially while staying grounded in the Bible. The program teaches participants how to avoid the extremes of being “so heavenly-minded they’re no earthly good” or becoming so focused on building worldly wealth that they lose sight of what truly matters.

    With its grace-filled approach and practical tools, True Financial Freedom helps Christians find the balance needed to change their financial life and make a lasting difference in the world in the process.

    Included:

    • 6 on-demand video sessions (around 60 mins each)
    • Printable worksheets, tools, and calculators (physical workbook also available)
    • Access to their Real Money Budgeting course (their popular (un)Budgeting approach)
    • Interactive exercises and a workshop-style approach

    Course Outline:

    1. Hope & Vision – Find new hope for your finances through Biblical financial principles, break free of defining your worth by your net worth.
    2. Design Your Blueprint – Learn the building block for your new plan, the “Never 100” rule to control income/spending.
    3. Straight A Strategy – Automate your finances using a simple 4-step ‘set it and forget it’ process.
    4. Earn More – Unlock your God-given gifts and talents to earn more in the digital era.
    5. Eternal Impact – Redefine giving as an eternal investment and epic adventure (not an obligation).
    6. Multiply & Enjoy – Simple investing strategies that can change your life, your family, and the world.

    Financial Peace University (Ramsey Solutions)

    Financial Peace University, created by Dave Ramsey and his team at Ramsey Solutions, is a highly popular financial education program that has helped countless individuals and families get out of debt and build wealth. The program’s primary goal is to guide participants through a proven, step-by-step approach to taking control of their money and achieving financial peace.

    Dave Ramsey's Baby Steps

    Dave Ramsey, the face of Financial Peace University, is known for his high-energy, tough love teaching style. He delivers hard-hitting truths about money with a sense of urgency and conviction that inspires participants to take action. However, some may find his approach a bit intense or even abrasive at times, likening it to going through bootcamp. While this style resonates with some, it may not be everyone’s preferred learning environment.

    The cornerstone of Financial Peace University is the “Baby Steps” system, a clear, prescriptive plan for getting out of debt and building wealth. The program heavily emphasizes the debt snowball method, which involves paying off debts from smallest to largest, regardless of interest rates. This approach has proven highly effective in keeping participants motivated and helping them experience quick wins on their debt-free journey.

    While Financial Peace University does incorporate some biblical principles, its overall approach is more secular in nature. The program focuses primarily on the practical nuts and bolts of money management, with less emphasis on exploring the deeper spiritual implications of financial stewardship.

    Financial Peace University is best suited for individuals and families who are drowning in debt and need a clear, actionable plan to get back on track. The program’s structured approach and intense motivation can be a lifeline for those feeling overwhelmed by their financial situation. However, those seeking a more personalized, grace-filled approach that deeply integrates biblical wisdom may find other programs more appealing.

    Included:

    • 9 video lessons walking through the 7 Baby Steps
    • 1 year access to the video lessons
    • 3 months access to EveryDollar budgeting app
    • Group financial coaching for 1 year
    • 1 free one-on-one coaching session
    • Digital workbook

    Course Outline:

    • Baby Step 1 & Budgeting – Build your $1,000 emergency buffer and gain control through budgeting
    • Baby Step 2 – Learn the debt snowball method to eliminate all non-mortgage debt fast
    • Baby Step 3 – Save 3-6 months’ expenses for a fully-loaded emergency fund
    • Baby Steps 4-7 – Invest 15% for retirement, save for college, pay off home, build wealth
    • Wise Spending – Outsmart marketing tactics to curb impulsive spending
    • Understanding Insurance – The 8 essential and unnecessary insurance types explained
    • Building Wealth – Simplify retirement investing to build lasting wealth
    • Buying & Selling Your Home – Avoid mortgage missteps – rent vs buy wisdom
    • Outrageous Generosity – Discover the joy of outrageous generosity


    MoneyLife (Crown Financial)

    MoneyLife, offered by Crown Financial, is a financial education program that takes a deeply biblical approach to money management. The program’s primary goal is to guide Christians in understanding and applying God’s financial principles to their lives, emphasizing the importance of seeing God as the ultimate provider and owner of all resources.

    One of MoneyLife’s distinguishing features is its strong focus on biblical teachings and spiritual practices related to money. The program dives deep into exploring how our financial decisions can reflect our faith and values, encouraging participants to align their money management with biblical principles. This emphasis on the spiritual aspects of finance sets MoneyLife apart from other programs that may focus more heavily on practical strategies.

    The teaching style in MoneyLife tends to be more academic and classroom-like compared to other programs. Participants can expect a significant amount of reading materials and written assessments throughout the course. While this approach may appeal to those who prefer a studious learning environment, it may not be as engaging for individuals who thrive on interactive, video-based content.

    MoneyLife offers some unique elements, such as personality assessments that help participants understand how their natural tendencies impact their financial decisions. The program also includes exercises like the transfer of ownership, which guides participants in acknowledging God’s ultimate ownership of their resources. These introspective activities can be powerful tools for reshaping participants’ mindsets and habits around money.

    However, one potential drawback of MoneyLife is that its emphasis on biblical principles and spiritual practices may come at the expense of providing highly actionable, practical financial strategies.

    MoneyLife is ideal for Christians who are seeking a deeply biblical understanding of money management and are willing to engage in a more studious, reflective learning process. The program is well-suited for those who want to explore the spiritual foundations of financial stewardship and align their money habits with their faith. However, those primarily looking for a simple and easy financial strategy or a more interactive learning experience may find other programs that better fit their needs.

    Included:

    • 10 self-paced video lessons
    • MoneyLife Indicator financial assessment
    • Lots of reading materials, PDFs, homework
    • Course syllabus and schedule
    • Spiritual practices like prayer logs

    Course Outline:

    MoneyLife (Crown Financial)

    1. Unwavering Hope – Find unshakable hope in God as the true provider
    2. The Plan – Develop a realistic spending plan aligned with God’s perspective
    3. Ditching Debt – Achieve debt freedom using biblical truth and practical tools
    4. Saving – Set short and long-term savings goals to steward resources well
    5. Investing – Build an investment portfolio to create a legacy of generosity
    6. Good Work – Identify your purpose to experience fulfillment in your career
    7. Generous Living – Overcome obstacles to experience the joy of committed giving
    8. Paying It Forward – Discover strategies to transfer wisdom to future generations
    9. True Riches – Align spending with needs vs. wants to pursue true wealth
    10. The Choice – Commit to choose God’s path for money to experience freedom

    Quick Comparison:

    Feature True Financial Freedom (SeedTime) Financial Peace University (Ramsey) MoneyLife (Crown Financial)
    Goal To give Christians a Biblical framework and practical tools so they can manage money wisely, experience true financial freedom, and make an eternal impact for God’s Kingdom. To help individuals and families get out of debt, build wealth, and take control of their money using a proven, step-by-step approach. To guide Christians in understanding and applying God’s financial principles, seeing Him as the ultimate provider, and aligning their finances with Biblical values.
    Approach -Strikes an effective balance between biblical wisdom and practical, actionable guidance.
    -Helps you manage money in a way that honors God and sets you up to thrive financially.
    -Heavily focused on getting out of debt using a proven system of “Baby Steps”.
    -Incorporates some biblical principles but is more secular in its overall approach.
    -Leans deeply into the biblical and spiritual side of money management. -Emphasizes seeing God as the ultimate provider.-Can feel a bit more theoretical at times.
    Teaching Style -Engaging, relatable, and empowering (feels up-to-date with the modern ‘YouTube’ era of online learning).
    -Real-life stories with humor and grace, making the course feel like a conversation with wise, caring friends.
    -A lot of energy and motivation, but his style can come across as a bit harsh or stern at times, which doesn’t resonate with everyone.
    -Comes across as more of a lecture than a workshop.
    -More academic and classroom-like, with a heavy emphasis on reading materials and assessments.
    -May not be as engaging for all learning types.
    Personalization -The interactive workshop style guides you in creating a personalized money strategy tailored to your unique situation and goals.
    -No one-size-fits-all plans, you build a blueprint that truly fits your life.
    -Provides a clear, prescriptive set of “Baby Steps” to follow for getting out of debt and building wealth.
    -While proven, it may not allow as much flexibility for individual circumstances.
    -Offers some helpful personalized tools like the MoneyLife Indicator assessment-Emphasis on “God as provider” means the program has a very specific outline to achieve that goal which may feel rigid.
    Unique Benefits -The simple “Never 100” rule for a done-is-better-than-perfect approach to saving.
    -“Straight A” strategy for automating your finances.
    -A strong focus on leveraging your unique God-given talents to increase your income.
    -Eternal Impact as the ultimate goal (giving, investing in the Kingdom, etc..)
    -Iconic “debt snowball” method for accelerating debt payoff and staying motivated.
    -Access to EveryDollar budgeting app.
    -Financial coaching resources.
    -Scripture memory-The “transfer of ownership” exercise to help align your mindset and habits with biblical financial principles.
    -Personality assessment to find and leverage your gifting.
    Perfect for… -Those who want to learn how to truly live and thrive in the ways of the Kingdom (not being so heavenly-minded that they’re of no earthly good, but also not getting caught up in building their own earthly kingdom)
    -A grace-filled, practical approach to experience true financial freedom and make an eternal impact!
    -Individuals and families who are drowning in debt and need a clear, proven, step-by-step plan to get out of debt and start building wealth, with some biblical grounding and intense motivation. -Those who desire a deeply biblical exploration of God’s role in our finances, with a focus on spiritual practices and mindset shifts.
    -Those who don’t mind a more academic, reading-heavy approach.

    Personal Experience and Recommendations

    Having gone through all 3 programs, here is my personal experience and recommendations:

    I can honestly say that True Financial Freedom was a life-changing experience. Bob and Linda’s warm, relatable teaching style made me feel like I was learning from trusted friends who truly cared about my success. The program’s emphasis on creating a personalized financial strategy was a game-changer for me, as it helped me develop a plan that fit my unique situation and goals.

    The “Never 100” rule and “Straight A” strategy have become cornerstones of my financial habits, helping me live below my means and automate my savings and giving. It was perfect for someone like myself who didn’t want a complicated, jargon-filled financial class – and wasn’t going to sign up for an intense ‘shame & blame’ session either.

    Personally, True Financial Freedom struck that balance better than any of the other programs on the list and gave me the strategy to move forward. My savings, giving, and earning have all increased in significant ways since taking the program.

    For those who are drowning in debt and need a clear, structured plan to get out, I highly recommend Financial Peace University. Dave Ramsey’s no-nonsense approach and the step-by-step “Baby Steps” system can provide the motivation and direction needed to tackle debt head-on. The debt snowball method, in particular, has helped countless people experience quick wins and build momentum on their debt-free journey. Just be prepared for a more intense, boot camp-style learning environment.

    If you’re seeking a program that deeply explores the biblical principles behind money management, Crown’s MoneyLife might be the right fit for you. The program’s emphasis on spiritual practices and aligning your finances with your faith can be incredibly powerful for those who want to grow in their understanding of God’s perspective on wealth. However, be prepared for a more academic, reading-intensive learning experience and less focus on highly practical, actionable strategies.

    Ultimately, the best program for you will depend on your unique financial situation, learning style, and personal goals. If you’re looking for a grace-filled, practical approach that helps you thrive in God’s Kingdom while making an eternal impact, I highly recommend True Financial Freedom. If you need a structured, intensive plan to get out of debt fast, Financial Peace University could be your best bet. And if you desire a deep dive into the biblical foundations of money management, MoneyLife is worth considering.

    Regardless of which program you choose, the most important thing is to take action and invest in your financial education. By doing so, you’ll be better equipped to handle the resources God has entrusted to you and experience the joy and freedom that comes from aligning your finances with your faith.

  • Starbucks Is Hiring a Pilot to Captain Its Company Aircraft

    Starbucks Is Hiring a Pilot to Captain Its Company Aircraft


    Starbucks is hiring a “Captain – Pilot-in-Command” for its company Gulfstream aircraft.

    According to the job posting, the role pays between $207,000 and $360,300 a year. (Business Insider notes that the average airline pilot earned around $250,000 in 2024.)

    Related: Starbucks’ New CEO Can Make Up to $113 Million in His First Year

    “The captain is one of the company’s most visible representatives to the passengers and serves as a Starbucks ambassador both at home and abroad,” the listing reads. “They model Starbucks’ guiding principles and act with tact and decorum, while providing the utmost in service and safety.”

    Starbucks reportedly has at least two Gulfstream G550 jets.

    While the job description doesn’t specifically say you’ll be helping the CEO get to the office so he can comply with the company’s return-to-office policy standards, it wouldn’t be a far-fetched idea. It’s been widely reported that Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol commutes over 1,000 miles multiple days a week from Newport Beach, California, to Starbucks’s headquarters in Seattle, Washington.

    A Gulfstream G550 from a private company (not Starbucks) lands at Barcelona airport in Barcelona, Spain, on August 30, 2024. Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images

    The pilot role has numerous responsibilities, including managing the flight and crew. Applicants should have a valid Airline Transport Pilot Certificate, a current 1st Class Medical Certificate, an FCC Restricted Radio Operator Certificate, and other FAA-based requirements.

    Candidates should also have at least five years of experience operating as a captain with a corporate flight department and at least 5,000 hours of flight time, plus other certificates. See the job listing for the full slate of required items.

    Related: ‘We’re Not Effective’: Starbucks CEO Tells Corporate Employees to ‘Own Whether or Not This Place Grows’

  • Why Using Exercise as Punishment Backfires—and What to Do Instead

    Why Using Exercise as Punishment Backfires—and What to Do Instead


    When you’ve coached as long as I have, you end up learning a lot of lessons. But most of them didn’t come from certifications, courses, or textbooks.

    They came from experience—coaching others, coaching myself. And honestly? From getting things wrong more than once.

    One thing I look back on now and think, What was I thinking?! is something I used to believe was helpful…

    Something I saw a lot of other coaches do, too: using exercise as a form of punishment.

    Ever trained a little harder after a weekend of indulgence?
    Added an extra round at the gym because you skipped a workout yesterday?
    Felt the need to “make up for” something?

    That was exactly the approach I took with clients when I first started out.

    You ate more than you were “supposed to” over the weekend? Let’s burn it off.
    You’re late for your session? Guess what—we’ll make it “hurt” a little more.

    It reinforced a message that’s been echoed for decades: No pain, no gain.

    Somewhere along the way, movement stopped being a celebration of what our bodies could do and a way to increase their capacity—and started becoming a tool to fix what was “wrong” with them and something we only do when we did something ‘bad.”

    Food became the reward.
    Exercise became the punishment.

    And that, right there, is the problem.

    Using Exercise as Punishment Changes Everything—Quietly and Deeply

    Every time we treat movement as “the stick” for doing something wrong, we plant a seed. A seed that says: Exercise is something to be avoided.

    Because no one looks forward to being punished.

    Even when a workout isn’t meant to be punishment, that’s the association we’ve built. We’re not moving because we want to—we’re moving because we feel we “have to.” And that’s how something positive becomes something we dread. That’s how we go from wanting to move to forcing ourselves to move.

    You can’t build something positive from something your brain has learned to fear.

    And then we wonder why we’ve lost the motivation, the energy, the excitement we used to feel.

    It Damages Our Relationship With Food—and With Ourselves

    In the punishment model:

    Cake = extra cardio.
    Lazy weekend = Monday burpees.

    But here’s the truth:
    Food isn’t something you need to earn.
    And your workout isn’t a “get out of jail free” card.

    It’s also not a solution to cravings or overeating.

    When we reinforce that food = guilt and exercise = punishment, we strip away the opportunity to build an empowered, healthy relationship with either.

    I remember a client who overindulged almost every weekend. And every Monday, I’d push them through an extra-tough session to “burn it off.”

    What I didn’t do? Ask them why it kept happening.

    I failed to see that my job as a coach wasn’t just to “make up for” the behavior…

    It was to help them understand it. To get curious about what was really going on. To work together to find a more supportive way forward.

    We didn’t change anything. We just kept repeating the cycle.

    That’s not coaching. That’s damage control.

    It Embeds Shame—And Shame Doesn’t Create Lasting Change

    Shame might get someone to show up. It might push them to do one more round, one more sprint, one more cleanse.

    But it doesn’t build confidence.
    It doesn’t create consistency.
    And it definitely doesn’t foster self-trust or long-term motivation.

    What it does is make the coach the driver.

    Now the client shows up not because they see value in the process—but because they want to avoid guilt, embarrassment, or disappointing someone.

    That’s not empowerment.
    That’s fear.

    And when fear is your main motivator, burnout, resentment, or avoidance easily follows.

    Shame disconnects us from the why behind movement. It strips exercise of its joy, its purpose, and its real benefits.

    Why would we tie something as essential and nourishing as movement to guilt, pain, or performance anxiety?

    And more importantly: Shouldn’t we be doing it for ourselves—not to please someone else?

    What I’d Tell My Younger Coach-Self Today

    I’d tell her:

    I know you thought you were helping.
    But you were reinforcing the same stories your clients already believed:

    • That they had to earn their right to eat.

    • That their body was a problem to be fixed.

    • That being shamed into change was effective.

    I’d show her there’s a better way.

    Because if a client “slips up” on their eating plan, the solution isn’t to punish them with sweat.
    It’s to ask:

    What made that choice feel like the right one at the moment?
    How can we support you next time to make a choice that feels more aligned to your goals and values?

    If someone misses a week of workouts, the answer isn’t to crush them when they return.
    It’s to help them reconnect to their why. To remind them what movement does for them—not what it takes from them.

    Movement Should Be a Partnership, Not a Punishment

    As coaches, our job isn’t just to correct.
    It’s to get curious. To listen. To guide.
    To create a safe space for self-discovery.
    To offer support and accountability—but from a place of respect and compassion, not control.

    You don’t need to move to make up for what you did—or didn’t—do.

    You move to build something:
    A stronger body.
    A calmer mind.
    A deeper connection with yourself.

    That shift—from punishment to partnership—is where real, lasting health begins.

    What would you tell your younger self about using exercise as punishment? —Marlene

  • My Biggest Investing Mistake and How You Can Avoid It

    My Biggest Investing Mistake and How You Can Avoid It


    It’s easy to tell people that they shouldn’t react emotionally when they’re investing. Don’t sell when you’re scared and don’t buy when you’re excited. Leave the emotion out of it.

    And I’ve written those same things over and over again because it’s good advice.

    But knowing not to do something logically is not the same as knowing it when you’re in the emotional soup that is daily life.

    One of my biggest investing mistakes was doing just that – reacting emotionally.

    During the pandemic, with all of our kids home, I sold some of our stock investments because I was scared. I did it in a way that resulted in no tax impact, I sold some winners and offset the capital gains by selling losers as well.

    I told myself I was taking money out of the volatile markets and making sure we had a cash cushion. That was accurate. As a small business owner with uncertain cash flows, it was true.

    But what prompted the move was fear. I justified it with a logical explanation.

    That’s the challenge with any type of decision making, it’s rarely done when things are normal and you’ve had a good night sleep.

    It’s hard to catch yourself making a mistake in the moment.

    It was a freaking pandemic.

    I kept my cool during financial meltdowns. I didn’t make the same mistake during the Great Recession as major financial institutions went under and the federal government had to step in with a Trouble Asset Relief Program. At the time, we thought the entire financial system was going to collapse.

    The difference was that my life was not being upended at the same time.

    The pandemic meant all four of our kids were home. It was also an airborne disease that had us wiping down our groceries and having little outside contact. We were worried for the health of our parents, who were more susceptible and unlikely to get treatment at packed hospitals.

    The hospitals starting putting beds in the parking lots. And I had friends who lost their parents to COVID-19.

    And on top of that, the markets were cratering as everything shut down and commerce stopped.

    So yeah, don’t make emotional decisions when you’re investing but good luck given those situations.

    You can justify your decision later using logic.

    It was easy to justify my decision logically. I run a business and it’s likely business revenue would go down, so I wanted to extract some cash from the only source I had – our investments. I sold winners and losers to limit the tax impact and build up a cash cushion.

    But what prompted the decision was fear. I was fearful because my kids were home and people were dying. Hospitals were at above maximum capacity.

    In the end, the mistake will only cost us capital gains that we’ve missed out on. We ended up needing some of the cash but we never put the money back in as a lump sum later on. I did continue are regularly monthly contributions (I never touched that automated transfer) so the damage was limited, but still there.

    It’s easy to do the right thing when times are good.

    I consider myself financially savvy. I even have proof that this type of emotional reaction isn’t common. I’ve lived through the housing bubble, the Great Recession, and even this latest round of tariff induced volatility.

    But I also know that I’m susceptible.

    Which means I need to put systems in place to avoid this and other similar errors.

    Here’s what I have in place to avoid this in the future

    I automate our investments. We have regularly scheduled contributions into our investment accounts for both our 401(k) as well as a taxable brokerage account. This system has been in place for nearly twenty years and acts as a floor for how much we invest each year.

    Something that is automated means it will not get forgotten. I try to automate as much as I can.

    I need to talk to someone before I make major changes. I always discuss major decisions with my lovely wife but I know for certain in this case she would’ve trusted my judgment. She’s savvy but it was a difficult time for everyone and I don’t think she would’ve been fully invested in thinking through the decision anyway.

    This is one of the reasons why people use a financial advisor that manages their investments for them. It’s an intermediary that you have to discuss decisions with before making them. It also adds an extra step, which in this case is a benefit.

    Gain a better understanding of actual needs. I predicted a future with lower income and then sought to draw on sources of cash. I should’ve looked at our spending using a budgeting tool, reviewed our emergency fund, and realized that we had at least a year of cushion already.

    The S&P recovered from the pandemic’s fall within months. We remember the pandemic as a multi-year situation but the impact on the stock market was only a few months. If I had done this careful analysis, the market would’ve recovered before we would’ve needed the cash.

    While there is no guarantee that the recovery was going to be that fast, I should’ve waited until we needed the funds to start selling.

    Review my risk tolerance. I’m in my mid-forties, which the “120 minus age” says I should have 75% of our investments in equities. I know our blend is still closer to 85% and perhaps I’m unable to stomach that volatility in times of turmoil and personal stress.

    That, of course, that portfolio allocation is just what I have in our portfolio and doesn’t consider our cash, so I have to look at our Empower Dashboard with our Net Worth to really see the breakdown. That’s not something I did.

    As my dad and other mentors have told me for ages, “slow down.”

    When I feel panic and pressure, the takeaway is that I should slow down and start writing and thinking rather than doing.

    Measure twice and cut once. Or in this case, don’t cut.

    What was your biggest investing mistake?

  • The Top Cyber Insurance Companies in the USA | 5-Star Cyber

    The Top Cyber Insurance Companies in the USA | 5-Star Cyber


    Virtual defenders

    Cybercriminals work around the clock, but so do America’s top cyber insurance companies – and their efforts haven’t gone unnoticed.

    In a landscape of relentless digital threats, Insurance Business America recognizes the nation’s leading cyber insurance providers. Thousands of brokers from across the country offered candid assessments of insurers’ performance in areas including coverage, adaptability, and claims handling. Only the best of the best were then awarded 5-Star status.

     

    “What resonates with brokers is that we’re more than an insurance carrier to their clients; we’re a full-service partner”

    Jacob IngerslevTokio Marine HCC – Cyber & Professional Lines Group

     

    Industry expert Michael Lieberman, co-founder and CTO of software firm Kusari, shares his thoughts on what a leading policy looks like in 2025.

    “It is something that is future proof at some level, that is evolving with the times as different types of cyberattacks become more sophisticated. What’s also very important is being crystal clear about what is covered and what is not,” he says.

    Fellow cyber insider Kelly O’Brien, senior cybersecurity practitioner at Compass IT Compliance, also defines what is market leading.

    “It should be broad, adaptive coverage including specific considerations for AI usage both internally and across third-party vendors,” she says. “It also goes beyond basic coverage by including proactive services like threat intelligence, security posture assessments, third-party risk tools, and workforce awareness training.”

    Other key differentiators include:


    Ransomware has become an even bigger threat for cyber insurers in 2025 as they react to an uptick in attacks. Part of the increase is down to the rise of ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) and AI-powered variants.

    The most common is by a VPN compromise as threat actors scan Secure Sockets Layers (SSL), commonly a web page log-in. From there, they use brute force and try thousands of password combinations a minute until they gain entry.

    “Upwards of 40 percent to 50 percent of ransomware attacks right now take place that way and it’s quite a simple technique. You don’t really need a lot of sophistication,” says Jacob Ingerslev, head of cyber and tech underwriting at 5-Star 2025 insurer Tokio Marine HCC – Cyber & Professional Lines Group.

    The other way ransomware is used by threat actors is to target a big vendor, knowing they can have a large impact if they can exfiltrate data.

    “If the vendor doesn’t pay up, then they can start extorting the individual customers,” adds Ingerslev.

    Deloitte’s annual Cyberthreat Trends Report observed a 17 percent increase in ransomware attack claims in 2024, peaking in the fourth quarter with 57 percent more claims compared to the fourth quarter of 2023.

    This jump is partly explained by the emergence of new ransomware groups such as:

    • ALPHV

       

    • El Dorado/BlackLock

       

    • Lynx

       

    • Fog

       

    • APT73/BASHE

    Some are judged to be nation state-sponsored cyber espionage, while others are financially motivated, which is another area where the best insurers have a role to play.

    For example, reports suggest that CDK Global paid a $25-million ransom after a cyberattack in 2024 and edtech provider PowerSchool confirmed it also paid out.

    Tokio Marine HCC – Cyber & Professional Lines Group’s data shows a drop in ransomware attacks in 2022, but that has rebounded and then some.

    “We saw a big increase year over year in Q1 of 2025. We look at these so-called leak sites, or the ‘wall of shame,’ which is, if you pay the ransom, you don’t end up on the ‘wall of shame.’ If you look at that in Q1 in 2025, there was an 86 percent increase year over year,” Ingerslev says. 

    “We can help with the negotiation if a ransom payment must take place. Typically, when all backups have been destroyed, that’s when you start considering [whether] it is better to pay the ransom, versus spending an exorbitant amount of money to rebuild the data from scratch.”

    Particular industries that fellow IBA’s 5-Star Cyber winner Arch Insurance has detected activity in are healthcare and manufacturing.

    “In healthcare, there’s technology dependency on operations, as well as a lot of sensitive data and information,” says Jamie Schibuk, executive vice president, professional liability and cyber. “We continue to see attacks on the operational technology that manufacturing companies rely upon, which often tends to be more legacy-type technology, which can create issues if those networks are compromised.”

    How America’s top cyber insurance companies navigate AI


    Lieberman sheds light on how some threat actors take advantage of AI hallucinations or how they seed the internet with bad data to convince new AI models to give misleading answers. 

    He says, “You could ask ChatGPT something, and it gives you an answer which seems reasonable to say, ‘Install this software’. It turns out that software was written by malicious actors, but you download it thinking, ‘I should get this software tool.’”

    However, the main danger from AI is refining and improving existing threats, as insurers are mainly seeing it deployed in social engineering attacks, as the tech enables threat actors to perfect emails. Often, criminals use AI to mimic the tone and style of emails between two parties using a large language model (LLM), which highly increases the chance of their email being taken at face value.

    “It’s very easy to spin up a natural-sounding email, particularly if they have already breached the customer’s inbox,” says Michael Drummond, chief underwriting officer cyber/tech at At-Bay. “Each new LLM model that comes out, you see an uptick in financial fraud because it’s making it easier to pull those things off, as it’s a lot harder to differentiate between what’s a legitimate email and a fraudulent one.”

    At-Bay, another of IBA’s 5-Star insurers of 2025, combats this by combing through all the claims that have resulted from these types of emails and using their system to pinpoint indicators that suggest fraudulent activity.

    “We know that 80 percent of our financial fraud claims arise from email attacks, so earlier this year, we launched a new email security solution that’s available to every insured in our portfolio,” says Drummond.

     

    “We’ve built all of our technology in-house from the ground up. So, not only are we a full-stack insurance company but have a separate security division that provides all of the security services to our insureds”

    Michael DrummondAt-Bay

     

    Due to At-Bay’s scale of having 40,000 business clients, from startups to those with $5 billion in revenue, the tool is powered by real-life claims data that mirrors the threats companies are facing. The firm believes so deeply in its solution that it’s willing to double or even quadruple the typical amount of coverage if clients adopt it.

    “We have access to information that traditional security providers and companies don’t, as we can actually see what really drives these types of claims and what causes them,” adds Drummond. “We have designed our security solution specifically to identify those characteristics.”

    Arch Insurance is even detecting the use of deepfakes to facilitate bank transfers.

    “The technology is advanced enough to fool people into thinking that they’re talking to the CFO of their company, when they’re really not,” says Schibuk.

    His other concern with AI is that threat actors can leverage it to increase the scale of their attacks. Remaining vigilant across this landscape is a daily concern for Arch. The firm has a 30-person underwriting team, but in addition also has a team of four cybersecurity risk engineers.

    “They all have a background working within security operation centers of companies, so they’re approaching it more from the client side. That’s really helpful in both the risk evaluation as well as helping us to vet a lot of third-party tools and risk management services, because they have actual implementation experience in using a lot of those tools,” says Schibuk.

    And he adds that high-quality professionals are still the difference makers.

    “There’s a lot of technology and process that we can leverage and implement, but at the end of the day, so much of it comes down to our approach to the business and the people that work on it every day.”

    Standout features of America’s top cyber insurance companies


    Tokio Marine HCC – Cyber & Professional Lines Group’s threat awareness and remaining in step with all the latest developments relies on its Cyber Threat Intelligence team, which has the tools to monitor clients’ networks on an ongoing basis. 

    The team has delivered for clients who have fallen victim to wire fraud transfer, as over the last year, it has recovered over $30 million by working with law enforcement and acting fast. It is also plugged into forums where tool kits are for sale that grant access to systems.

    This learning mindset is a competitive advantage to the firm, as it continually explores and discovers what threat actors are planning and then informs their insureds. One such way is via honeypots – fake machines on the internet that look like an actual company with an actual server but are just there to pick up activity and learn what threat actors are doing.

    Ingerslev says, “That’s one way to learn, and the other way is to collaborate with people who operate in the dark web forums. One company we work with intercepts attacks by purchasing access to customers from threat actors.”

    There is also great benefit from Tokio Marine HCC – Cyber & Professional Lines Group’s in-house Incident Response Management team that gathers forensic reports from all the claims. 

    “We can determine what are the most common causes of loss, and what are the most common ways threat actors get into a network, and also address these. That feedback loop is so important,” says Ingerslev.

    Highlighting just how powerful this is, Tokio Marine HCC – Cyber & Professional Lines Group often discovers software vulnerabilities before even the vendors of the technology do.

    Ingerslev adds, “In some cases, we’re faster and it’s because we have the claims. That’s why we see it quickly and we have a very strong incentive to help the clients, because it helps us, too.”

    Enabling brokers to deliver


    Arch prioritizes awareness and ensures it puts brokers in the best possible positions with its clients.

    Schibuk appreciates that brokers’ role has become harder in cyber due to the risk factors and advancing technology.

    “With all the value-added services, they’re helping to facilitate that conversation, so they’re a really key part of the process and enable us to roll out a lot of the risk management services.”

    The industry has become more technical over the past five years and Arch’s Integrated Risk engineering team has become more sophisticated around the questions it asks and the tools it utilizes to evaluate.

    “We’re definitely a very entrepreneurial type of company. We take pride in being creative on how we approach risk,” says Schibuk. “We have a more flexible approach than a lot of others in the marketplace, along with the ability to customize coverage for individual insureds.”

     

    “There’s no standard cyber policy. Every single one is different, and we work really closely with our brokers to customize coverage, relative to what an insured’s individual risk profile is”

    Jamie SchibukArch Insurance

     

    This mentality extends to At-Bay, where the team is focused on enabling brokers to understand the security posture of clients. The team ensures that brokers understand its products and what puts companies at risk from cyber threats.

    The At-Bay team views itself as a resource for brokers to lean on.

    “We’re happy to engage at whatever level they want, from very deep technical conversations to just making sure who are the right people to call or hand the customer off to if they’re not as comfortable, getting into the weeds on some of the cybersecurity stuff,” says Drummond.

    Giving brokers license to customize products is another service that At-Bay brings to the table. Its software engineers and developers built the company’s entire underwriting platform, claims system, and security platform. This affords them the ability to have a tight feedback loop across all business operations. 

    Its InsurSec solution, At-Bay Stance™, is a unified security platform that helps insureds proactively identify and mitigate cyber risks associated with 86 percent of customer claims. Access is included with every Cyber and Tech E&O policy and offers an estimated value of up to $72,000 per year in security solutions.

    Earlier this year, At-Bay also launched two new InsurSec solutions designed to combat the most common type of cyber claim: financial fraud. These tools help prevent fraud before it happens and can unlock enhanced coverage terms for eligible insureds, including financial fraud sublimits of up to $1 million.

    At the core is the firm’s ethos of responsiveness and critical thinking.

    Drummond says, “Whether that’s a more complex or less complex account, our folks are there to have those conversations and they aren’t afraid to think outside of the box and tailor something.”


    Flexibility, responding quickly and running educational webinars are ways Tokio Marine HCC – Cyber & Professional Lines Group supports its brokers. The firm is also content to be transparent about what it does and what it can offer.

    “Even if a competitor knows our techniques and approach to client monitoring, alerting and the incident response, it would still take them a long time to build something similar. So, we’re comfortable,” says Ingerslev.

    Tokio Marine HCC – Cyber & Professional Lines Group’s primary target market is the small to mid-sized segments that can use the insurer’s preventative services, compared to a Fortune 1000 company that is likely to have in-house cyber teams.

    This year’s recognition is the fifth successive annual cyber award for Tokio Marine HCC – Cyber & Professional Lines Group, which supports its view that its infrastructure and systems in place are formidable.

    “It’s a stamp of quality and also a sign of consistency,” adds Ingerslev. “We are a big global insurer with very solid financial stability behind us, and that allows us to continue to stay relevant and have a reasonable market share, but also not fall into some traps in parts of the market cycle.”


    Both industry experts – Lieberman and O’Brien – who spoke to IBA for this report agree that cyber insurance has not yet reached the maturity where it exists alongside more established areas such as flood or fire.

    O’Brien says, “They are backed by decades of actuarial data, but cyber insurance is still evolving due to the rapid pace of technological change and the volatility of cyber threats. Many incidents go unreported, and the risk landscape continues to shift, making it harder to standardize and stabilize the market to the same degree.”

    Lieberman also points to the rapidly evolving nature of the market, which makes it difficult to define coverage and leads to confusion.

    “If a new type of attack is discovered, is that covered automatically? The challenge for a lot of insurance companies is that the state of things is changing so fast,” he says.

    And he also cites that the cuts to government agencies focused on compliance and regulations in the cyber security space is leading to concerns. For example, National Institute of Standards and Technologies (NIST) lost hundreds of cybersecurity staff due to downsizing. Part of its role is to run the National Vulnerability Database, which some fear may disappear in the future.

    Liberman adds, “If it does go away, what is going to be there is unclear. That’s a huge problem for insurance companies, because they’re viewing this as if you have vulnerabilities that exist in the database, and you need to fix them. But if that goes away, what are they going to use as a gauge to say you have this vulnerability?”

    • AIG
    • AXA XL
    • Beazley
    • CFC
    • Chubb
    • Cowbell
  • PGA TOUR Championship to have Starting Strokes eliminated starting in 2025

    PGA TOUR Championship to have Starting Strokes eliminated starting in 2025


    At long last it is over.

    It was announced on Tuesday that the PGA TOUR Championship at East Lake will officially begin with every player at even par. Starting Strokes are a thing of the past.

    From the PGA TOUR:

    As part of its ongoing commitment to accelerate innovation on behalf of fans, the PGA TOUR announced updates to its TOUR Championship format. Beginning this year, Starting Strokes will be eliminated from the season-ending TOUR Championship as the TOUR’s top players compete for a chance to win the PGA TOUR’s Ultimate Prize, the FedExCup.

    Ultimately the PGA TOUR announced three specific changes to the TOUR Championship.

    Elimination of Starting Strokes – The TOUR Championship will be played as a 72-hole stroke-play event, with all players starting the tournament at even par. The best performer over the course of four rounds at the TOUR Championship will win the FedExCup.

    Adjustments to Course Setup – In response to data indicating fans want to see winning scores closer to par, the PGA TOUR Rules Committee will adjust its course setup approach to encourage more risk/reward moments throughout each round, further heightening the drama and competition to determine the FedExCup Champion.

    Toughest Tournament to Qualify for – Already the most elite field in golf, the TOUR Championship field size will remain at 30 players in 2025. The Player Advisory Council is studying the qualification system of future years to raise the stakes on the entire FedExCup season and reinforce the TOUR Championship as the hardest tournament to qualify for.

    The second and third points here are significant obviously, but they carry far less impact relative to the past than Starting Strokes. While it made sense to reward players for their success all season long in spirit the reality is that Starting Strokes really took away a point of competitiveness in the event. It makes more sense to go at it like a traditional tournament.

    Scottie Scheffler spoke on the changes:

    “We want the TOUR Championship to be the hardest tournament to qualify for and the FedExCup trophy the most difficult to win,”

    “Shifting the TOUR Championship to a more straight-up format with a tougher course setup makes it easier for fans to follow and provides a more challenging test for players – which brings out the best competition.”

    These changes, notably the elimination of Starting Strokes as mentioned, certainly help the cause of making this event the hardest in golf to win become more attainable.

    Good for the players and the TOUR on making this happen.